Global Investment Pulse
  • Investing
  • Stock
  • Business
  • Politics
Business

Pentagon will remove media offices after judge reinstates New York Times press credentials

by admin March 26, 2026
March 26, 2026

The Defense Department will remove media offices from the Pentagon after a federal judge sided with The New York Times in a lawsuit challenging limits on reporters’ access to the building, a department official announced Monday.

An area of the Pentagon known as “Correspondents’ Corridor” that reporters have used for decades to cover the U.S. military will close immediately, department spokesperson Sean Parnell said. Journalists will eventually be able to work from an “annex” outside the building, which he said “will be available when ready.” He offered no detail about how long that will take.

The Pentagon Press Association said the announcement “is a clear violation of the letter and spirit of last week’s ruling.”

“At such a critical time, we ask why the Pentagon is choosing to restrict vital press freedoms that help inform all Americans,” the association said.

The new policy is the latest dispute over press access to President Donald Trump’s administration, which has limited legacy media while boosting conservative and pro-Trump outlets.

The Times sued the Pentagon and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth in December, claiming the agency’s new credentialing policy violated journalists’ constitutional rights to free speech and due process. Dozens of reporters had walked out of the building rather than agree to government-imposed restrictions on their work.

U.S. District Judge Paul Friedman in Washington, D.C., last week sided with the newspaper. He ordered the Pentagon to reinstate the press credentials of seven Times journalists and struck down some of the agency’s restrictions on news reporting.

Friedman said the “undisputed evidence” shows that the policy is designed to weed out “disfavored journalists” and replace them with those who are “on board and willing to serve” the government, a clear instance of illegal viewpoint discrimination.

Parnell said the Defense Department disagrees with the ruling and is pursuing an appeal. He said security concerns prompted restrictions on press access, a claim that journalists have rejected.

Under the latest Pentagon rules announced Monday, journalists will still have access to the Pentagon for press conferences and interviews arranged through the department’s public affairs team, but they will have to be escorted, Parnell wrote on social media.

The current Pentagon press corps is comprised mostly of conservative outlets that agreed to the policy. Reporters from outlets that refused to consent to the new rules, including from The Associated Press, have continued reporting on the military.

The AP, meanwhile, is awaiting a decision by a three-judge panel of the U.S. District Court of Appeals on its separate lawsuit against President Donald Trump’s administration. The AP contends that Trump’s White House team punished it by reducing its access to presidential events because the outlet hasn’t followed his lead in renaming the Gulf of Mexico.

previous post
U.S. stocks rise, oil prices fall after Trump backs off threat to hit Iran’s power grid
next post
America’s wealth gap is growing, and Trump’s policies are making it bigger

You may also like

Trump rejects off-ramp to fund DHS as airport...

March 26, 2026

U.S. stocks rise, oil prices fall after Trump...

March 26, 2026

America’s wealth gap is growing, and Trump’s policies...

March 26, 2026

Trump backs off escalation, but Iran war goes...

March 26, 2026

United Airlines says it will boot passengers who...

March 7, 2026

DOJ takes Live Nation-Ticketmaster to court for antitrust...

March 5, 2026

L.A. County sues Roblox, alleges platform makes it...

February 22, 2026

Warner Bros. Discovery reopens talks with Paramount

February 19, 2026

CFTC chief sides with prediction markets over state...

February 19, 2026

Justice Department’s antitrust chief says she’s leaving, effective...

February 15, 2026

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

    Join our mailing list to get access to special deals, promotions, and insider information. Your exclusive benefits await! Enjoy personalized recommendations, first dibs on sales, and members-only content that makes you feel like a true VIP. Sign up now and start saving!


    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • S&P 500 Breaking Out Again: What This Means for Your Portfolio

      March 26, 2026
    • Trump backs off escalation, but Iran war goes on amid ‘productive’ talks

      March 26, 2026
    • America’s wealth gap is growing, and Trump’s policies are making it bigger

      March 26, 2026
    • Pentagon will remove media offices after judge reinstates New York Times press credentials

      March 26, 2026
    • U.S. stocks rise, oil prices fall after Trump backs off threat to hit Iran’s power grid

      March 26, 2026
    • About us
    • Contacts
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Email Whitelisting

    Disclaimer: globalinvestmentpulse.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 globalinvestmentpulse.com | All Rights Reserved

    Global Investment Pulse
    • Investing
    • Stock
    • Business
    • Politics